<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Play the Web - Latest Comments in Microformats for the Masses</title><link>http://playtheweb.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://playtheweb.disqus.com/microformats_for_the_masses/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:53:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Microformats for the Masses</title><link>http://playtheweb.org/2008/08/18/microformats-for-the-masses/#comment-19273799</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have no idea about Microformats but I'm glad to learn and read more information about this and how does it works.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Miami web designer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:53:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microformats for the Masses</title><link>http://playtheweb.org/2008/08/18/microformats-for-the-masses/#comment-13382595</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My website has microformats. But I am still not sure whether it improves things. I hope it does because it was quite a bit of work - studying the concept and implementing it. I wonder whether they will expand the standard to music. A bit like what you have with idv3 tagging in mp3s. Or better still when will search engines ever index mp3s and other audio files properly. Attention is only on video, but rarely music.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">musicproducer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:14:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>